Monday, December 21, 2009

Coco Fusco



"Fusco’s work combine electronic media and performance in a variety of formats, from staged multi-media performances incorporating large scale projections and closed circuit television to live performances streamed to the internet that invite audiences to chart the course of action through chat interaction. Her most recent work deals with the role of female interrogators in the War on Terror. Those works include Operation Atropos (a film about interrogation training), and A Room of One’s Own (a monologue about female interrogators). Fusco is currently developing a new performance that explores the “Black Codes” that were established in the Americas after slavery for the 2010 World Congress of the International Drama/Theatre Education Association in Brazil. She is also researching a new project on the experience of incarceration in the United States."

Thursday, December 17, 2009

The Photography of Santiago Mostyn









These are images from Santiago Mostyn's book All Most Heaven, available from TV books.
 
An Exhibit of the images was organized and presented by the Needles and Pens gallery in San Francisco. Interesting work.

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Change we can believe in?

Glenn Greenwald discusses Obama's conflicted civil liberties record.

The People Speak





In other disasters... healthcare "reform"

The healthcare bill compromised recognition.
 
Darcy Burner of Alternet explains:
Thanks to Joe Lieberman, the Senate health-care bill — now with no public option or Medicare buy-in — leaves progressives no choice but to kill it.

"The first rule of medicine is, "Do no harm." The post-Joe Lieberman version of the Senate health care bill fails that basic criterion. Unless Democratic leadership steps up to fix this misguided proposal, our only recourse will be to kill it.

The fundamental failing of the newest Senate proposal is that it requires individuals to purchase health insurance, but does nothing to rein in what insurance companies charge. There is nothing to stop spiraling health costs from eating up an ever-increasing percentage of our national productivity."

"We should fight for the House bill, which does a better job on all fronts. With some minor tweaks to ensure that women can get the reproductive care they and their doctors think they need, it's a decent bill on the right trajectory.
But if it's Joe Lieberman's bill or nothing? Kill it."

Slate ponders the consequences too.

and where is Obama in this dialogue???

FUCK YOU BEN BERNANKE

The good banker?

Time urges their irrelevance by naming Bernanke "person of the year."

As much as this makes me see red they do note the designation is not intended as an award of merit, but as recognition of influence regardless of good or ill.... 
yeah, most people are going to remember that. The article itself practically fauns over him. Disgusting.

Stengel goes on to blather about how Bailin' Ben saved the country from another depression. Oh, if the world were so simple.

No mention is made of Bernanke's years with profit vampire Goldman Sachs where he essentially participated in the fraudulent practices what Time so eagerly claims he saved us from!
 
He managed to convince Congress that the country would collapse without the banks and so the Congress sold out the public, only to have the banks in turn return almost INSTANTLY to their profit scheming with impunity, posting record profits within 2 quarters.

"We want to work with the banks to make sure that they balance the appropriate prudence and caution against the need to make good loans for the economy, and for their own profits." —Ben Bernanke

The banks should have been let to fail. We would at least be free of their chokehold. As it is we are now their slaves. Democracy is a lie if it is always the rich and powerful that are protected and the working citizen is left to live in ruins, which is essentially what has happened.

So, to Mr. Bernanke, what do to say to all the ordinary people who's lives were ruined in order to save the precious banks?

Time asked him somthing similar:
"So, I'm a fringe economics type, I'm not personally, but I'm saying a reader picks up TIME Magazine, and they see this and they go, oh, my God, Ben Bernanke, low interest rates caused this whole thing. He's just an extension of that devil man, Alan Greenspan. Low interest rates, this is the whole cause. What's your bullet answer to that? 

It's hard to give a bullet answer.
Myth-busters answer. 

Monetary policy in the early part of this decade was accommodated for good reasons. There was a recession in 2001, there was the jobless recovery, inflation was very low. Keeping interest rates low to get the economy back on track was a reasonable thing to do. I think there are a lot of forces that led to the crisis, a whole range of things were relevant there. I don't think that monetary policy was a particularly important source of the crisis."

WTF? What is that supposed to mean?

Mr. Bernanke, what do you say to the middle aged man or woman with no insurance who has been unemployed for so long that they aren't even counted among the jobless- what do you say when they see the banks paying millions in bonuses to their executives and posting record profits?

What do you say to to everyone buried in debt or has been ravaged by deceptive lending practices?

What do you say to people have no hope, no savings and no where to turn? How do they fit into your "too big to fail" plan? That it could have been worse? How much worse can you get than unemployed, broke and homeless?!

FUCK YOU, Mister Bernanke, FUCK YOU and the privilege you rode in on.

And FUCK YOU to Hank Paulson and Tim Geithner, and all the bastards at banks raking in billions for themselves and their evil corporations, and shame on Congress and Obama for going along with it all.

Greenwald give a more articulate critique at salon.

Karen Dunville

from her collection Springtown. 












Shades of Jon Benet, revisited


The Photography of Susan Anderson

I saw this on The LA times Culture blog and was really stunned. Leah Ollman writes:
"Susan Anderson's pictures are straight shots, mostly head-and-shoulders portraits of little girls (as young as 4) in their competitive finery. The special effects have all been put to work earlier, in readying the kids for their moment before the judges – and the camera. Artifice runs so high it verges on the grotesque. "Little Miss Sunshine" has been bested by Little Miss Spray Tan."





"Anderson, a commercial photographer specializing in portraiture and fashion, traveled to beauty pageant sites around the country for the last three years, shooting the girls in portable studios, against pastel backgrounds glimmering with paparazzi-flash bursts of light. Her clean, slick style suits the subjects; nothing distracts from the human spectacle."



"Though Anderson invites the subjects to pose themselves and says she intervenes only minimally, that doesn't mean the girls look natural or relaxed. Competition has expunged the natural from their vocabulary of behavior and appearance. Image is all, and whatever it takes to achieve the "High Glitz" look these competitions favor is fair game: false fingernails, brilliant white veneers on the teeth, makeup to turn an already smooth cheek into a surface of flawless – and frightening — uniformity."


Tammy Faye reincarnated?



so wrong

Susan Andersons Book High Glitz is avaiable from PowerHouse. If you dare.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Wild imagination



A guilty pleasure of mine recently has been watching Ghost Hunters on Syfy. 

I know there are a number of these kind of shows on right now, most of which are ridiculous, but I think GH is of a better cut. It's mostly effect anyway, they usually dont find much. Some eeire audio, bumps, occasionally something genuinely strange. Is it real?
I'm sure it could all be faked, but I don't care much, because it's the idea that more interesting to me. As for fantastic occurrences, unless I experience it myself I'm not going to believe or deny anyone elses experience.

I ran across a couple interesting articles about myths and legends, one of which articulated:

"Science deals with many entities that have never been observed directly. No one has seen a black hole. No one has seen a boson. These things are known by their effects, by the traces that they leave: by bending light, by tracks left in particle detectors."

The map is virtually closed, there are no more unexplored places in the world, yet we as humans still need spaces to explore...



So maybe it's paranormal activity...


or supposedly extinct beasts






or ones invented entirely by someone's imagination

In the end whether they are real or not is irrelevant, we are satisfied by the journey in of itself.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Planet Wasteland

The Christian Science Monitor looks at polluted environments around the globe.


Beijing, China by Fredric J. Brown/AFP/Newscom


Clearcut Rainforest, Indonesia


Chernoybl Exclusionary Zone, Belarus by Sergei Supinsy Newscom/FILE



Oil spill, Queensland Australia by Dave Hunt/AFP/AAP


More clearcut rainforest. Thank you Cargill! by Neswcom


  Scrapped Taxi's in China by AFP/Newscom

This was part of a slideshow on polluted environments, but the link doesn't seem to work now. It was an interesting piece. I include the link just in case it is restored.